Robotic Vs. “Real” Pets (Part 2): Animal-Assisted Therapy & Loneliness in Nursing Homes: Use of Robotic Vs. Living Dogs

Posted on Updated on

AIBO_ERS-210As humans we might like to think that we couldn’t be “fooled” by a robot; that there is some indefinable “it” factor that would always give itself away to us and let us know deep down on some level that we were dealing with an inorganic life form.  Unfortunately for us, the “it” theory has no scientific evidence to support it – quite the contrary.  In a 2008 study (authored by: Marian R. Banks, DNS, Lisa M. Willoughby, PhD, and William A. Banks, MD) researchers found that elderly residents living in long-term care facilities who received scheduled Animal-Assisted Therapy (AAT) with either a living or robotic dog were significantly less lonely than those who did not receive AAT, and that there was no difference between the effectiveness of a living and robotic dog in reducing loneliness.

And while this finding is significant on its own, this study was done in 2008, and since that time both robotics and artificial intelligence research has advance significantly:

(1)  Scientists at the University of Texas (Austin) have advanced artificial intelligence to the point that they were able to simulate mental illness in a computer.

(2)  A professor at the University of Georgia presented the results of an experiment in which scientists were able to teach a group of robots to cheat and deceive.

(3)  Scientists at the Laboratory of Intelligent Systems developed a group of “ruthless robots” that refused to help each other locate food and in some cases intentionally diverted other robots away from the “food” source.

(4)  Google has developed a neural network simulation system supercomputer with both imagination and the ability to teach itself.  In an experiment, this supercomputer was given free access to the Internet and the ability to examine the contents of the network. There were no restrictions or guidelines, the powerful super intelligence was simply allowed to explore the entire human history and experience. And what do you think this supercomputer has chosen out of all this wealth of information?  Yes, it began browsing though images of kittens.

(5)  Another self-learning supercomputer was fed millions of newspaper articles starting from 1945.  Using this wealth of information about past events, the computer was asked to come up with suggestions on what would happen in the “future.”  And these turned out to be surprisingly accurate guesses.  How accurate?   Well, for example, it had located Bin Laden.

Also, the robot dog used in the 2008 long-term care facility experiment was not fully used to its (now six year old) potential; it was not allowed to walk around and interact on its own, and its voice and face recognition software were not used to its full capacity.  It is possible that the effects of the robot dog might have been even more enhanced had these features been activated.

robots:  six, “it” factor:  zero

———————————————————————————————-

http://www.robots.nu/assets/DownloadPDF/Animal-Assisted-Therapy-and-Loneliness-in-Nursing-Homes-Use-of-Robotic-versus-Living-Dogs-PIIS1525861007005166.pdf

http://www.learning-mind.com/five-creepiest-advances-in-artificial-intelligence/

2 thoughts on “Robotic Vs. “Real” Pets (Part 2): Animal-Assisted Therapy & Loneliness in Nursing Homes: Use of Robotic Vs. Living Dogs

    BeckyPiscitella said:
    February 20, 2014 at 10:28 AM

    That’s very nice, but for my friend Wendy, who was an avid dog lover and started the “Bark for Life Cancer Walk” that included walking your dog, it would not have been the same. When she was no longer able to open her eyes or speak, I can only imagine it was more of the smell, combined with the feel of the fur, the panting, body warmth, heart beat, and hot breath, not to mention the way the golden molded to her side when she snuggled against her that made her smile. I know you will argue that is not a study. Wendy didn’t need a study and I’m so glad the therapy dog was there as she passed away. No study will ever convince me of this.

      Smiling Through My Teeth responded:
      February 20, 2014 at 3:08 PM

      It is clear that this is a deeply personal issue to you and that despite the format you don’t really want your beliefs in this regard challenged, so I will just say that I am deeply sorry for the loss of your friend and that I am glad that she had some comfort at the end.

Leave a comment